We've all been there? A growing list of CVs staring back at you, some ok, most irrelevant but each one providing a meticulously crafted snapshot of a candidate's professional journey. In a competitive job market, we diligently scan for those magic keywords, the names of prestigious companies, the experience that seems tailor-made for the role. But what if the very document we rely on for that initial assessment – the humble CV – is often giving us an incomplete, and sometimes downright misleading, picture of a candidate's true potential?
Increasingly backed by robust research, is the correlation between a CV and actual on-the-job performance is generally considered weaker than we might think. Consider it: a CV is a static document, a self-reported history reel. It tells us what someone has done, but offers precious little insight into how they did it, their ability to adapt to the ever-shifting sands of the UK business landscape, their appetite for learning, or whether they'll be a good fit down the pub with the team after work (cultural fit, as we call it!).
That seminal work in personnel psychology by Schmidt and Hunter (1998) – a real cornerstone in our field – consistently demonstrated that general mental ability (GMA) tests and well-structured interviews were far stronger predictors of job success than simply the years of experience or qualifications listed on a CV. While experience certainly has its place, its impact can be overemphasised when viewed in isolation, like judging a book solely by its (often glossy) cover.
More recently, a study published in the esteemed Journal of Applied Psychology echoed these findings, particularly highlighting the limitations of using past experience alone to predict future success in today's dynamic and rapidly evolving roles. The researchers stressed the importance of evaluating competencies, practical skills, and how someone might handle real-world scenarios – aspects a CV often fails to truly capture.
So, why does this disconnect exist? Several factors contribute to the CV's limitations:
- The "Halo Effect" and Our Own Biases: We're only human. That impressive Oxbridge degree or a stint at a well-known City firm can unconsciously sway us, leading us to make assumptions about a candidate's abilities without digging deeper. This can blind us to brilliant individuals with less traditional career paths but potentially greater raw talent.
- The Art of the Sell: Let's be honest, a CV is a marketing tool. Candidates are naturally going to present their experience in the most favourable light, perhaps glossing over less successful ventures or exaggerating their individual contributions. We've been assessing CV's for over 20 years and it's still a challenge to separate genuine achievement from skillful self-promotion on paper.
- The Ever-Changing Workplace: The UK job market is anything but static. New technologies emerge, industries shift, and the skills needed for success evolve rapidly. A CV reflecting past triumphs in a different context might not accurately predict how someone will perform in a new environment demanding a different skillset.
- The Missing "Human Touch": Collaboration, clear communication (crucial in our diverse UK workplaces!), problem-solving under pressure, and that all-important adaptability – these "soft skills" are incredibly difficult to quantify or assess from a CV alone. Yet, they are often the very qualities that drive team cohesion and overall organisational success.
So, what's the takeaway for us, the gatekeepers of talent in the UK? It's a clear call to look beyond a purely CV-centric approach and embrace more insightful and predictive methods. Delving more deeply into the person and not just the CV. This means:
- Direct Communication: The art of conversation. Just pick up the phone to talk to the candidate. You'll find out more about them, their achievements and motivation. You'll also quickly discover fact from fiction if they can't recall any of their key highlights - saving valuable time in inviting them to interview before properly qualifying.
- Putting Skills First: Implementing practical assessments and exercises that directly evaluate the skills and competencies essential for excelling in the role. Think project challenges PM's, writing samples for surveyors, or even role-playing scenarios for client-facing positions.
- Mastering the Structured Interview: Moving beyond casual chats to using standardised questions and clear evaluation criteria to objectively assess candidates' behavioural patterns, problem-solving prowess, and how they might integrate into your company culture.
- Seeing is Believing: Work Samples and Simulations: Where appropriate, providing candidates with realistic tasks that allow you to observe their abilities in action. This offers a far more tangible understanding of their capabilities than simply reading about them.
- Spotting Potential: Focusing on Learning Agility and Growth Mindset: Looking beyond past achievements to identify individuals who demonstrate a genuine curiosity, a willingness to learn new things, and the capacity to adapt and grow with your organisation.
Don't get me wrong, the CV still has its place in the recruitment process, providing a valuable overview of a candidate's background and career trajectory. However, it should be viewed as just one piece of the puzzle, not the ultimate predictor of future success. By acknowledging its inherent limitations and embracing more robust and forward-thinking assessment methods, you can identify truly exceptional talent who will not only thrive but also contribute meaningfully to the success of your business.
Shift your focus from simply reading about the past to actively evaluating the exciting potential for the future.
What are your thoughts? What innovative recruitment methods have you found successful? Share your experiences in the comments below!